[../../../../includes/header6.htm]
[../../../links.htm]  

Session Information

2007 Regular Session Highlights

Previous  |  Next  |  Contents

Agriculture/Rural Development

 by: Greg Waddell
       (225) 342-3565  
    

ALTERNATIVE FUELS

Several pieces of legislation this session dealt with the burgeoning issue of alternative fuels such as ethanol and bio-diesel.  House Bill 852 by Representative Daniel (pending House Ways and Means) repeals the repeals the minimum ethanol and bio-diesel standards for gasoline and diesel which requires the use of a certain percentage of alternative renewable fuel when the production of alternative renewable fuels reached a specified threshold.  The minimum ethanol and bio-diesel standards were enacted into law pursuant to Act 313 of the 2006 Regular Session.  In addition, this legislation provides for tax credits to a manufacturer or producer of biofuel in this state from Louisiana income or corporation franchise taxes as an incentive for the development of the ethanol, bio-diesel, and alternative renewable fuel industry and agricultural production in this state. The tax credit is in the amount of twenty cents per gallon for bio-diesel, ethanol, and alternate renewable fuel not produced from cellulose and thirty cents per gallon for ethanol, bio-diesel, and alternative renewable fuel produced from cellulose.  Additionally, the credit would only apply to the first 25 million gallons produced at each facility for each taxable year.  House Bill 551 by Representative Strain (pending House Ways and Means) also provides for the same tax credits without repealing the minimum ethanol and bio-diesel standards.

House Bill 576 by Representative Tucker (pending House Agriculture) repeals the minimum ethanol and bio-diesel standards for gasoline and diesel which requires the use of a certain percentage of alternative renewable fuel when the production of alternative renewable fuels reached a specified threshold.  The minimum ethanol and bio-diesel standards were enacted into law pursuant to Act 313 of the 2006 Regular Session.

ANIMALS

Livestock

Senate Bill 246 by Senator Cain (involuntarily deferred-Senate Agriculture) known as the "Farm Freedom Act" prohibits the state of Louisiana from accepting federal funds for the purpose of participating in the United States Department of Agriculture National Animal Identification System (NAIS).  The NAIS is a national information system that is aimed at helping producers and animal health officials respond quickly and effectively to animal health events in the United States.  At this point in time participation in the program by the states is optional and only a handful of states participate. 

Pets

House Bill 630 by Representative Triche (pending House Final Passage) creates the Louisiana Animal Shelter Fund and Commission which has a stated mission of helping to protect the residents and animals owned by residents of the state of Louisiana from loss due to disease or injury caused by the overpopulation of and lack of control of dogs and coats within the state.  Under this legislation the Louisiana Animal Shelter Commission would impose a tax of twenty cents per ton on all manufacturers of pet food who sell their pet food in the state.  The proceeds of this tax would then go to the various parishes to fund or establish any of the following: (1) programs for the housing, feeding, maintenance or euthanasia of stray or previously owned dogs and cats, (2) programs which will acquaint owners with the regulations and proper techniques of responsible pet ownership, or (3) programs to reduce pet animal overpopulation through the use of surgical techniques which are made available to the public through arrangements with local, private practicing veterinarians within each parish.  

Animal Cruelty

Louisiana is the last state in the nation which does not prohibit cockfighting.  Several bills this session attempted to prohibit the practice of cockfighting, including House Bill 101 by Representative Strain (pending House Agriculture), House Bill 108 by Representative Richie (Act 425), Senate Bill 39 by Senator Lentini (pending House Agriculture), and Senate Bill 221 by Senator Lentini (Act 223)Senate Bill 39 creates the crime of cockfighting which is the causing of two or more roosters to engage in fighting.  This legislation provides that cockfighting is to be considered as cruelty to animals and carry the same punishment.  In addition, the legislation further criminalizes the transportation of any gamecock for the purpose of having the animal engage in a cockfight or organizing, promoting, or conducting any cockfight and provides that those found in violation shall be charged with a misdemeanor.

House Bill 108 broadens the scope of the crime of cruelty to animals to encompass cockfighting.  This legislation creates the crime of organizing or conducting a commercial or private cockfight, wherein there is a display of combat or fighting among one or more domestic or feral chickens and in which it is intended or reasonably foreseeable that the chickens would be injured, maimed, mutilated, or killed.  The legislation further prohibits persons from possessing, training, purchasing, or selling any chicken with the intent that the chicken engage in an unlawful cockfight.  The penalties under this framework would consist of a first offense misdemeanor, and conviction of a second or subsequent offense would be a felony.  The legislation provides for a one year phase out period and  becomes effective on August 15, 2008, and this is the major difference in this legislation from Senate Bill 39 which provides for immediate effectiveness and no phase out period.

Senate Bill 221 creates the crime of gambling or wagering at cockfights which is the aiding or abetting or participation in any game, contest, lottery or contrivance, in any location where a cockfight is being conducted and whereby a person risks the loss of anything of value in order to realize a profit.  This legislation provides that a person who commits the crime of gambling or wagering at a cockfight shall be fined not more than $500 or imprisoned for not more than 6 months, or both, and upon a second or subsequent offense the person shall be fined $1,000 or imprisoned for not more than 1 year, or both.  In addition, the legislation provides that whoever conducts, finances, manages, supervises, directs, or owns all or part of a business or premises when the person has knowledge that gambling or wagering at a cockfight occurs shall be fined not more than $20,000 or imprisoned with or without hard labor, for not more than 5 years, or both.

AGRICULTURAL TAX CREDITS

Transportation of Agricultural Commodities

Several pieces of legislation provide for tax credits against income tax to offset the cost of transportation of commodities from the field to the first point of processing.  Senate Bill 350 by Senator Nevers (pending Senate Revenue & Fiscal Affairs) grants a tax credit against individual or corporate income tax to the taxpayer who bears the cost of transporting the commodity in an amount equal to five cents per ton per mile the commodity is transported within the state from the point of harvest to the point of delivery.  This legislation would apply to those commodities in which the producer, owner, or processor can produce a scale ticket or point of delivery invoice which reflects the weight of the commodity and the point of delivery.

Senate Bill 357 by Senator Nevers (pending Senate Revenue & Fiscal Affairs) also provides for a tax credit against individual or corporate income tax to the taxpayer who bears the cost of transporting a commodity in an amount of 2.5 cents per mile the commodity is transported within the state.  This tax credit would be taken by farmers of agricultural commodities that cannot produce a scale ticket or other point of delivery invoice which reflects the weight of the commodity and the point of delivery.  The legislation provides that the Department of Revenue is to promulgate rules and regulations which require the farmer to submit documentation with their returns or to specifically retain such records that will enable the department to determine the taxpayer's eligibility for and amount of the tax credit claimed.

Farm Income

House Bill 206 by Representative Jack Smith (pending House Ways and Means) provides for a deduction from the individual income tax for farm income.  This exemption would be effective for the taxable periods beginning on January 1, 2007 and ending on December 31, 2010.

Milk

House Bill 901 by Representative Richie (substitute-adopted on House Floor) provides for a refundable tax credit against any Louisiana income tax and the corporate franchise tax for a taxpayer engaged in the business of producing milk for sale and the USDA Class I price of fluid milk in Louisiana drops below the production price at any time during the taxable year.  The legislation also provides for establishment of a production price which includes such factors as the price of milk from the top five states from which milk is imported into Louisiana, the average transportation cost of importing milk from those five states, and the cost of production in the state of Louisiana.  Each qualifying taxpayer would be eligible for a ten thousand dollar tax credit based on the production and sale of the first five hundred thousand pounds of milk sold below the production price over a calender year.

Farm Equipment

Several pieces of legislation this session provide for refundable tax credits or state sales tax exemptions for the purchase of farm equipment.  House Bill 29 by Representative Morrish (Act 424) amends the current law, which only imposes the state sales and use tax on the sale of farm equipment to that portion of the sale price in excess of $50,000, to allow the full purchase price of applicable farm equipment to be exempt from the state sales and use tax.

Senate Bill 26 by Senator Nevers (Act 245) expands the option of political subdivisions to grant farm machinery and equipment an immediate or phased-in exclusion from their taxes and to grant an exclusion for other machinery, equipment, supplies, materials, or services used or consumed in the business of farming.

Utilities

Senate Bill 331 by Senator Ellington (Act 471) provides for an exclusion from the state sales and use tax for natural gas and electricity purchased for use by a paper or wood products manufacturing facility.  Under current law, there is a existing exemption for electricity and natural gas which has been suspended for 3.3 of 4 cents of state sales tax for non-residential use.  Pursuant to this legislation, natural gas and electricity purchased by a paper or wood products manufacturing facility would be permanently exempted from the state sales tax.

House Bill 911 by Representative Townsend (pending House Ways and Means) provides for a state sales and use tax exclusion for propane and butane for certain businesses.  Current law provides for an exclusion for consumer purchases of any fuel or gas for residential use.  This legislation would expand this exclusion for the sale and purchase of propane and butane by agricultural business.

House Bill 635 by Representative Fannin (pending House Ways and Means) provides for an exemption from the state sales and use tax for the sale at retail, the use, the consumption, distribution, and storage of steam, water, electric power, natural gas, and propane used or consumed for farm purposes by the producers of agricultural commodities.  The exemption would be appicable to all taxable periods beginning on or after July 1, 2007.

FORESTRY

Several bills this session dealt with the timber severance tax.  Senate Bill 24 by Senator Nevers (pending Senate Revenue & Fiscal Affairs) and  Senate Bill 239 by Senator Nevers (pending Senate Revenue & Fiscal Affairs) provide for exempting certain timber and pulpwood from the severance tax if a parish governing authority determines that a hurricane or other emergency declared by the governor has caused great damage or destruction and has materially increased the cost of severing and retrieving tree and timber.  Senate Bill 239 would be retroactive to August 28, 2005, and this is the only substantial difference in the two pieces of legislation.

Under current law, the proceeds from the severance tax on timber is split between the state and the parish from which the timber was severed.  The state receives 75% while the parish receives 25%.  The state's portion of the proceeds from the severance tax is further divided with 75% going into the Forest Productivity Fund and the other 25% going into the state general fund.  Senate Bill 21 by Senator Smith (vetoed by the governor) changes the allocation of the state's portion of the severance tax and provides that 100% of the severance tax the state receives shall be deposited into the Forest Productivity Fund.



[../../../../includes/disclaimer.htm]